Publishing OntoUML projects & LICENSE

unibz-core / UFO-S

OntoUML model - A commitment-based account of the notion of service

MIT License

1 stars 0 forks source link

Publishing OntoUML projects & LICENSE #1

Open MarekSuchanek opened 6 years ago

MarekSuchanek commented 6 years ago

Hello all, two general questions about publishing OntoUML projects on GitHub:

Is it OK to publish projects/repositories from menthor.net in this manner? Please tell me your opinion (the metadata file is not ready yet).
What LICENSE should we use for those projects?

luizbonino commented 6 years ago

What kind of projects are we talking about? The OntoUML editor?

MarekSuchanek commented 6 years ago

Projects from the "model repository" (Tiago provided me a list) that are supposed to be moved to GitHub... I've already moved this one (https://github.com/OntoUML/UFO-S) as first example.

After having them on GitHub (with own history, issues tracking, ...) we will connect them with our community portal.

luizbonino commented 6 years ago

I'd say that the creators of each of these projects should decide on the license. Or we can define that, at least initially, we will assign a CC-BY or MIT license on every project, then the owners should agree or not on allowing us to publish the projects in the portal.

tgoprince commented 6 years ago

Before I uploaded the projects on menthor.net, I explicitly asked the authors for permission. However, note that some models have no identified authors (see http://www.menthor.net/banking-operations.html), since they asked explicitly to remain anonymous.

I believe using the MIT license as a standard option is a good idea and I can contact the authors again for their authorization.