macchiati
commented
5 months ago Makes sense
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024, 12:41 Robin Leroy @.***> wrote:
With our process that involves ~50 PRs in flight (and counting, this will only start going down after 16.0 is out), any impediment to automatic merge resolution is a significant pain. For most files, merges are resolved by ignoring the conflict markers and regenerating the files. ArabicShaping is manually maintained, and has bitten me recently while trying to synchronize all my PRs.
If we treat the schematic name as a pseudoproperty (we treat the joining type as a pseudoproperty Other_Joining_Type anyway), this should be tractable.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unicode-org/unicodetools/issues/860, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACJLEMF4EBBXJDOPATMAEGDZGIEFDAVCNFSM6AAAAABI7GUP4SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGM2DCMBVHA2TONY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
With our process that involves ~50 PRs in flight (and counting, this will only start going down after 16.0 is out), any impediment to automatic merge resolution is a significant pain. For most files, merges are resolved by ignoring the conflict markers and regenerating the files. ArabicShaping is manually maintained, and has bitten me recently while trying to synchronize all my PRs.
If we treat the schematic name as a pseudoproperty (we treat the joining type as a pseudoproperty Other_Joining_Type anyway), this should be tractable.