Closed markhalliwell closed 8 years ago
Am I wrong in my assumption that we can just remove this file outright?
@frob we can remove it but unless things have changed or I have completely misunderstood (both very possible) then the functionality needs to be added to drupal.org first before we can commit the removal here (see the d.o issue linked from the original issue post).
Edit: and thank you :)
Yup, I understand that to be the case too. I just saw #256 and thought I would check off the lowest hanging fruit. We not have a pull request for this issue, and we can focus on the next. I will have to actually create a dev environment for any others, so that will have to wait till another free moment. :)
@frob wonderful, thanks again.
The PR was against the 2.x branch, so I went ahead and merged.
2.x is in preparation for all the CKE changes about to made on d.o, which will apparently have "templates" included with it (see https://www.drupal.org/node/2578695).
Oh yeah, I planned that. I totally read all the docs and made the changes on the correct branch. ;)
@markcarver ah I was wanting to ask about the 2.x branch, thanks! FYI I recently changed the default branch from 2.x to 1.x when merging another bugfix (I merged it to both branches). Feel free to change back if 2.x is more appropriate.
@frob ha :) thanks.
@Cottser, yeah 2.x
should be default. I just changed it back. 1.x
is EOL now considering the changes that will need to be made for everything.
So then, should all further contribution be done on the 2.x branch?
This is a follow-up from https://github.com/unicorn-fail/dreditor/issues/253#issuecomment-98425848 and the last feedback from a.m.o:
This is specifically talking about the issue summary templates being hosted on d.o:
They do no care that we can inherently trust d.o because we have restricted these nodes to a handful of people who require higher permissions to edit them. This must be moved to drupal.org: https://www.drupal.org/node/1393226