unional / test-progress-tracker

Test Progress Tracker
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

chore(deps): update dependency jest-junit to v15 - autoclosed #85

Closed renovate[bot] closed 1 year ago

renovate[bot] commented 1 year ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jest-junit ^13.0.0 -> ^15.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jest-community/jest-junit ### [`v15.0.0`](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/releases/tag/v15.0.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/compare/v14.0.1...v15.0.0) Remove invalid ESC control sequence from XML output [https://github.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/230](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/230) - by [@​stevenxu-db](https://togithub.com/stevenxu-db) ### [`v14.0.1`](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/releases/tag/v14.0.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/compare/v14.0.0...v14.0.1) Prevent unnecessary duplicate test cases by [@​azzlack](https://togithub.com/azzlack) - [https://github.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/221](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/221) ### [`v14.0.0`](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/releases/tag/v14.0.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/compare/v13.2.0...v14.0.0) - Fix getOptions support for Windows machines [#​215](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/issues/215) by [@​mastrzyz](https://togithub.com/mastrzyz) - Failures in Test hooks like "AfterAll" now get shown in the Junit Results [#​214](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/issues/214) by [@​mastrzyz](https://togithub.com/mastrzyz) ### [`v13.2.0`](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/releases/tag/v13.2.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/compare/v13.1.0...v13.2.0) Support monorepos better via filePathPrefix option by [@​marvinroger](https://togithub.com/marvinroger) - [https://github.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/209](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/209) Fix CI builds for windows and drop support for Node 10.x - [https://github.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/210](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/210) ### [`v13.1.0`](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/releases/tag/v13.1.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/compare/v13.0.0...v13.1.0) Configurable test suite properties file location by [@​JohanBrorson](https://togithub.com/JohanBrorson) - [https://github.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/204](https://togithub.com/jest-community/jest-junit/pull/204)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 98.91% // Head: 98.91% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (c0842af) compared to base (75dd5dd). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #85 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.91% 98.91% ======================================= Files 9 9 Lines 92 92 Branches 15 15 ======================================= Hits 91 91 Misses 1 1 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Homa+Wong). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Homa+Wong)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.