Closed fabienjuif closed 6 years ago
fixes #118
@EmrysMyrddin This is not really "by reference", because we are looking for the key if the type is object but I guess it is ok like that ? WDYT ?
object
Coverage increased (+0.009%) to 99.541% when pulling 799ccfebbf8fe707d478579d129f5bdb99a93dbf on remove into ae3763b07248ef64638eb44a3e5b278fe0e8218b on master.
Yes I'm agree with that. It's what I had in mind :-)
Nice, then if you can review this PR it would be cool ;)
fixes #118
@EmrysMyrddin This is not really "by reference", because we are looking for the key if the type is
object
but I guess it is ok like that ? WDYT ?