Open aryairani opened 10 months ago
Some ideas:
If we go with option 1, if you wanted to reuse a name, you'd have to rename first in UCM, then rename back manually in the scratch file? Or would we have a separate command for renaming in branch only, vs branch+scratch?
@hojberg wdyt?
I also think that the update improvements will make this less of an issue. One of the reasons that I encountered it so much previously is that I basically had to keep all of the terms in my scratch file. If I'm back to editing fewer terms at a time, this is less of an issue.
@aryairani and I met briefly and came to a similar conclusion to what @ceedubs is saying. We'll have to wait and see how things play out, but there's definitely going to be cases when this would be useful. In those cases, I think I'd lean to option 1. I do however also feel there's something powerful and interesting in option 2. It almost sounds like an interactive transcript and that might be a really cool UX.
Although I edit relatively few terms at the time, I'd still like Option 1 to exist
Idea: support a rename directive in the scratch file. On save, it would make the change to the namespace, and re-print the scratch file.