Closed nickdgardner closed 1 year ago
Hello @nickdgardner, thank you for your interest in Mitiq! If this is a bug report, please provide screenshots and/or minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, so we can do our best to help get it fixed. If you have any questions in the meantime, you can also ask us on the Unitary Fund Discord.
Nice start Nick! Let's try to keep this limited to error mitigation specific terms and concepts for now. We have the common acronyms wiki page here, which could be a source of info.
I think starting small and building from there is the way to go for this.
Ok sounds good! I'll put a link to a doc on the agenda ahead of Friday's meeting with some draft definitions for people to look at.
Link to Overleaf (thanks Nick!): https://www.overleaf.com/7945521889pgjpnsvkjzyd
Thanks @nickdgardner, looks great. Can we move to discuss porting the "Definitely Include?" list? It could be good to assign some terms to others. But to begin, this issue could be resolved by adding the glossary to the docs quickly and creating the scaffolding for populating more terms.
Sounds good! I'll have a draft glossary page to look at for the community call today and we can go from there.
Feedback/suggestions very welcome, especially on:
Overleaf doc for drafting, additional notes: https://www.overleaf.com/7945521889pgjpnsvkjzyd
Issue Description
Coverage of certain core concepts necessary for understanding and motivating quantum error mitigation is not adequate in standard intro to QC resources currently (the coverage is variously too basic or advanced or dispersed). This makes Mitiq less accessible than it could be.
Proposed Solution
Add a single-page glossary of concepts that are important for understanding/motivating QEM but aren't covered adequately (for Mitiq's purposes) in the standard intro QC resources.
Each concept/term could consist of:
Candidate terms for glossary
For concepts that are intrinsically complex and/or have complicated formalisms, I think the aim while writing a definition should be to define it informally but as precisely as possible in a few sentences.
As for the imagined audience (lowest level of presumed background), I am thinking (but other suggestions welcome): someone with basic knowledge of quantum computing (not a total beginner) who may have heard of error mitigation and variational algorithms but who does not know what they are.
The goal of a glossary definition should be to provide a person from the imagined audience with additional background they need to follow the core Mitiq documentation and the examples.
Definitely Include
Maybe Include
Action items
Additional references
Possible external resources to link in term definition, if a reader wants more detail
Papers (especially surveys)
If resource is a paper, should be included in Mitiq references and linked through there. TODO: clean up, add links
Other (online articles, documentation)
Models/inspiration from other documentation