Closed axelgenus closed 7 years ago
Sorry but I have to insist on keeping these as is. If we change name of the package it will no longer show up as an upgrade to Unity.Mvc. We are not creating a new package, we slightly upgrade the old one so let's stick with historic names and preserve the legacy :)
Ok, I will revert the package renaming.
Just get the fresh one from repo. You have stale project files which create conflicts when merging.
I will keep the package name the same and align at least the namespaces.
PS: do you use any kind of collaboration tool like slack? It would be useful to exchange opinions...
You will make ReSharper and early adopters very unhappy. If you not using ReSharper, I'd suggest you do. They offer free license for Open Source contributors.
Actually, I am not opposed to it, just want to keep it in the green with ReSharper.
I can't access any of these. GitHub is the best option for me.
My ReSharper is always happy... ;)
For namespace's checks it uses RootNamespace and not PackageId.
Well, as long as you writing release note explaining the rationale for the change and deal with angry early adopters, I am fine with it :)
Deal. ;)
Here is what I changed: