Closed masatake closed 3 years ago
Thanks!
I really like the idea of using @
for scope info. Maybe in the "interactively filtering" tool (that comes in the future), we can let the user type @string
to filter tags whose scope contains string
.
I have 2 more ideas:
/
and @
in kind/type@scope
) a different face.__anon**
parts in scope and typeref info.But that's for the future. For now, thanks for your work!
Truncate the long __anon** parts in scope and typeref info.
Showing anon** in an xref buffer can be useful. You can do "M-." on anon** to jump to the definition.
Showing anon** in an xref buffer can be useful. You can do "M-." on anon** to jump to the definition.
I see. It's still useful for citre-jump
and citre-peek
though. We can have a switch for it.
I just tried the situation you described. I can jump to an anonymous tag by M-.
, but citre-peek
will show me the definition of the line, not the symbol at point.
I'm thinking should we let citre-peek
grab the symbol at point in annotations in xref buffer.
Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO yamato@redhat.com