Closed masatake closed 11 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
fae067a
) 85.02% compared to head (600075f
) 85.02%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
??? Why the errors of the test case is not reproduced?
It seems that I must cherry-pick #3854.
The input for the failed case uses CR+LF as the line separator. In cc24c85, I added a new test case cloned from the test case with changing the line separator to LF. The cloned test case didn't fail.
@leleliu008 I added AC_RUN_IFELSE to configure.ac. What do you think about this? I'm afraid of breaking the cross-compiling infrastructure you have polished.
@leleliu008 I added AC_RUN_IFELSE to configure.ac. What do you think about this? I'm afraid of breaking the cross-compiling infrastructure you have polished.
Could we disable this check while cross-compiling?
As I am afraid, running configure on s390x has failed.
@leleliu008 thank you.
-- Macro: AC_RUN_IFELSE (INPUT, [ACTION-IF-TRUE], [ACTION-IF-FALSE],
[ACTION-IF-CROSS-COMPILING = ‘AC_MSG_FAILURE’])
O.K. I will fill the 4th parameter.
About the macos-13 workflow fails, please pick up https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/pull/3861, I have merged it to master branch, it should be fixed.
@leleliu008 Thank you.
What I studied while developing this puu request is that pkg-config
doesn't support &&
operator.
I won!
See #3851 .