I have tried recording the interface level changes since 6.0.0 as man pages.
As explained by @b4n, "supporting language" doesn't make sense in ctags.
However, what kind of "kinds" ctags trying to extract may have some sense for people developing client tools.
When we add a new parser, we must add a man page for it. I must review what parsers we have added since 6.0.0.
See 3985.
As explained by @b4n, "supporting language" doesn't make sense in ctags. However, what kind of "kinds" ctags trying to extract may have some sense for people developing client tools.
When we add a new parser, we must add a man page for it. I must review what parsers we have added since 6.0.0.
Originally posted by @masatake in https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/issues/3985#issuecomment-2110609171
In the pages, required "features" must be written.