unjs / magic-regexp

A compiled-away, type-safe, readable RegExp alternative
https://regexp.dev
MIT License
3.67k stars 51 forks source link

chore(deps): update devdependency expect-type to v0.17.3 #376

Closed renovate[bot] closed 4 months ago

renovate[bot] commented 4 months ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
expect-type 0.16.0 -> 0.17.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

mmkal/expect-type (expect-type) ### [`v0.17.3`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/tag/v0.17.3) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/compare/v0.17.2...v0.17.3) - docs: why-is-my-assertion-failing [`907b8aa`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/commit/907b8aa) - I think the previous build was out of date somehow too, so see https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/v0.17.2 ### [`v0.17.2`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/tag/v0.17.2) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/compare/v0.17.1...v0.17.2) - Improve tuple errors ([#​40](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/issues/40)) [`4b38117`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/commit/4b38117) Diff(truncated - scroll right!): ```diff test('toEqualTypeOf with tuples', () => { const assertion = `expectTypeOf<[[number], [1], []]>().toEqualTypeOf<[[number], [2], []]>()` expect(tsErrors(assertion)).toMatchInlineSnapshot(` - "test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '[[number], [2], []]' does not satisfy the constraint '{ [x: number]: { [x: number]: number; [iterator]: (() => IterableIterator<1>) | (() => IterableIterator) | (() => IterableIterator); [unscopables]: (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }) | (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }) | (() => { copyWithin: boolean; entries: boolean; fill: boolean; find: boolean; findIndex: boolean; keys: boolean; values: boolean; }); length: 0 | 1; toString: ... truncated!!!!'. - Types of property 'sort' are incompatible. - Type '(compareFn?: ((a: [] | [number] | [2], b: [] | [number] | [2]) => number) | undefined) => [[number], [2], []]' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: function, Actual: function\\"'. + "test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '[[number], [2], []]' does not satisfy the constraint '{ 0: { 0: number; }; 1: { 0: \\"Expected: literal number: 2, Actual: literal number: 1\\"; }; 2: {}; }'. + The types of '1[0]' are incompatible between these types. + Type '2' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: literal number: 2, Actual: literal number: 1\\"'. 999 expectTypeOf<[[number], [1], []]>().toEqualTypeOf<[[number], [2], []]>() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~" `) }) ``` ### [`v0.17.1`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/tag/v0.17.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/compare/v0.17.0...v0.17.1) - disallow `.not` and `.branded` together [`cf38918`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/commit/cf38918) (this was actually documented in the [v0.17.0 release](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/tag/v0.17.0) but really it was only pushed here) ### [`v0.17.0`](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/releases/tag/v0.17.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/compare/v0.16.0...v0.17.0) [#​16](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/issues/16) went in to - hopefully - significantly improve the error messages produce on failing assertions. Here's an example of how vitest's failing tests were improved: Before: image After: image Docs copied from [the readme](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type#error-messages) about how to interpret these error messages *** ##### Error messages When types don't match, `.toEqualTypeOf` and `.toMatchTypeOf` use a special helper type to produce error messages that are as actionable as possible. But there's a bit of an nuance to understanding them. Since the assertions are written "fluently", the failure should be on the "expected" type, not the "actual" type (`expect().toEqualTypeOf()`). This means that type errors can be a little confusing - so this library produces a `MismatchInfo` type to try to make explicit what the expectation is. For example: ```ts expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>() ``` Is an assertion that will fail, since `{a: 1}` has type `{a: number}` and not `{a: string}`. The error message in this case will read something like this: test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2344: Type '{ a: string; }' does not satisfy the constraint '{ a: \\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"; }'. Types of property 'a' are incompatible. Type 'string' is not assignable to type '\\"Expected: string, Actual: number\\"'. 999 expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>() Note that the type constraint reported is a human-readable messaging specifying both the "expected" and "actual" types. Rather than taking the sentence `Types of property 'a' are incompatible // Type 'string' is not assignable to type "Expected: string, Actual: number"` literally - just look at the property name (`'a'`) and the message: `Expected: string, Actual: number`. This will tell you what's wrong, in most cases. Extremely complex types will of course be more effort to debug, and may require some experimentation. Please [raise an issue](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type) if the error messages are actually misleading. The `toBe...` methods (like `toBeString`, `toBeNumber`, `toBeVoid` etc.) fail by resolving to a non-callable type when the `Actual` type under test doesn't match up. For example, the failure for an assertion like `expectTypeOf(1).toBeString()` will look something like this: test/test.ts:999:999 - error TS2349: This expression is not callable. Type 'ExpectString' has no call signatures. 999 expectTypeOf(1).toBeString() ~~~~~~~~~~ The `This expression is not callable` part isn't all that helpful - the meaningful error is the next line, `Type 'ExpectString has no call signatures`. This essentially means you passed a number but asserted it should be a string. If TypeScript added support for ["throw" types](https://togithub.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/40468) these error messagess could be improved. Until then they will take a certain amount of squinting. ##### Concrete "expected" objects vs typeargs Error messages for an assertion like this: ```ts expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf({a: ''}) ``` Will be less helpful than for an assertion like this: ```ts expectTypeOf({a: 1}).toEqualTypeOf<{a: string}>() ``` This is because the TypeScript compiler needs to infer the typearg for the `.toEqualTypeOf({a: ''})` style, and this library can only mark it as a failure by comparing it against a generic `Mismatch` type. So, where possible, use a typearg rather than a concrete type for `.toEqualTypeOf` and `toMatchTypeOf`. If it's much more convenient to compare two concrete types, you can use `typeof`: ```ts const one = valueFromFunctionOne({some: {complex: inputs}}) const two = valueFromFunctionTwo({some: {other: inputs}}) expectTypeOf(one).toEqualTypeof() ``` *** Kinda-breaking changes: essentially none, but technically, `.branded` no longer returns a "full" `ExpectTypeOf` instance at compile-time. Previously you could do this: ```ts expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>() expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().not.branded.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>() ``` Now that won't work (and it was always slightly nonsensical), so you'd have to use `// @​ts-expect-error` instead of `not` if you have a negated case where you need `branded`: ```ts // @​ts-expect-error expectTypeOf<{a: {b: 1} & {c: 1}}>().branded.not.toEqualTypeOf<{a: {b: 1; c: ''}}>() ``` *** #### What's Changed - Improve CLI error messages by [@​mmkal](https://togithub.com/mmkal) in [https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/16](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/16) - expect-type is usually a dev dependency by [@​SerkanSipahi](https://togithub.com/SerkanSipahi) in [https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/39](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/39) #### New Contributors - [@​SerkanSipahi](https://togithub.com/SerkanSipahi) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/39](https://togithub.com/mmkal/expect-type/pull/39) **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/mmkal/expect-type/compare/v0.16.0...v0.17.0

Configuration

šŸ“… Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC).

šŸš¦ Automerge: Enabled.

ā™» Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

šŸ”• Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (fda7cd3) 100.00% compared to head (0eb5555) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #376 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 7 7 Lines 629 629 Branches 65 65 ========================================= Hits 629 629 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.