unknowIfGuestInDream commented 1 week ago

Fixes #1811

Proposed Changes

...
...
...

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

[ ] If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request

Reviewing Maintainer

[ ] Label as either enhancement, bug, documentation or dependencies
[ ] Verify design and implementation

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

Introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow 'pr.yml' to automate checks on pull requests targeting the 'master' branch.

Summary by CodeRabbit

新功能
- 引入新的配置文件 .commit-check.yml，用于强制执行提交信息和分支命名规范，并验证作者详细信息。
- 新增 GitHub Actions 工作流 commit-check.yml，在针对 master 分支的拉取请求时触发，执行多个检查。
工作流更新
- 修改了 GitHub Actions 工作流配置，确保仅修改 .commit-check.yml 文件的推送不会触发工作流。

vercel[bot] commented 1 week ago

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
javafx-tool	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 15, 2024 2:04pm

naming-conventions-bot[bot] commented 1 week ago

Thank you for following naming conventions! 😻

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR adds a new GitHub Actions workflow file (pr.yml) that sets up automated checks for pull requests. The workflow extracts and exposes pull request information as environment variables when running against the master branch.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for pull request information extraction	Configured workflow to trigger on pull requests to master branch Added step to checkout repository code Implemented environment variable extraction for PR number, title, URL, and author Added step to print all environment variables for debugging	`.github/workflows/pr.yml`

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#1811	Implement a workflow to check PR information	✅

Tips and commands

#### Interacting with Sourcery - **Trigger a new review:** Comment `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - **Continue discussions:** Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments. - **Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment:** Ask Sourcery to create an issue from a review comment by replying to it. - **Generate a pull request title:** Write `@sourcery-ai` anywhere in the pull request title to generate a title at any time. - **Generate a pull request summary:** Write `@sourcery-ai summary` anywhere in the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use this command to specify where the summary should be inserted. #### Customizing Your Experience Access your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai) to: - Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request summary, the reviewer's guide, and others. - Change the review language. - Add, remove or edit custom review instructions. - Adjust other review settings. #### Getting Help - [Contact our support team](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) for questions or feedback. - Visit our [documentation](https://docs.sourcery.ai) for detailed guides and information. - Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on [X/Twitter](https://x.com/SourceryAI), [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/sourcery-ai/) or [GitHub](https://github.com/sourcery-ai).

quine-bot[bot] commented 1 week ago

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

@unknowIfGuestInDream has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 1111 public PRs merged

Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉

Here's a good example of their work: javafxTool (Javafx scaffolding, built on JDK17 + JavaFX21 + controlsfx 11.x.x + Maven)

From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Java and HTML.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: https://github.com/unknowIfGuestInDream/javafxTool/pull/1813

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Walkthrough

此拉取请求引入了一个新的配置文件.commit-check.yml，用于强制执行提交信息和分支命名约定，并验证作者详细信息。此外，新增了一个GitHub Actions工作流commit-check.yml，该工作流在针对master分支的拉取请求时触发，并执行一系列检查以确保提交符合标准。同时，.github/workflows/artifact.yml文件中的paths-ignore部分也进行了调整，以避免仅修改.commit-check.yml文件时触发工作流。

Changes

文件路径	更改摘要
`.commit-check.yml`	新增配置文件，定义了提交信息、分支名称、作者名称、作者邮箱和合并基础的检查。
`.github/workflows/artifact.yml`	修改`push`事件触发器的`paths-ignore`部分，避免仅修改`.commit-check.yml`时触发工作流。
`.github/workflows/commit-check.yml`	新增工作流文件，定义了在拉取请求时执行的提交检查作业。

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
提交信息和分支命名检查 (#1811)	✅
验证作者详细信息 (#1811)	✅

Possibly related PRs

1810: 此PR增强了Jenkins管道的日志记录和条件检查，可能与此PR中引入的提交和分支验证过程相关。

Suggested labels

size/L

Poem

在兔子洞里新规则，
提交信息要合格，
分支名称要规范，
作者信息要准确，
让代码更整洁，
一起努力不懈怠！ 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

what-the-diff[bot] commented 1 week ago

PR Summary

Introducing New Configuration File for Commit Checks We've incorporated a new configuration file .commit-check.yml. This will perform validation on information like commit messages, branch, author name and email, and the base of the merge.
Implementation of Automated Commit Checks We're making the process more automated by introducing a new GitHub Actions workflow. Named .github/workflows/commit-check.yml, this new system will perform commit checks automatically whenever pull requests are made to the master branch.
Update to Artifact Workflow To help coordinate the automated checks, we've updated our .github/workflows/artifact.yml. This update ensures that our new .commit-check.yml file is included in the list of files subject to automated checks.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Qodana Community for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

unknowIfGuestInDream commented 1 week ago