eleniTriantafillou
commented
1 year ago Indeed, great catch Amr, that was a typo. I've updated the notebook accordingly, and added some further clarifications :)
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:43 PM Amr Khalifa @.***> wrote:
The comment after the plot of histogram of losses on train vs test set of the pre-trained model (first plot) says: "As per the above plot, the distributions of losses are quite different between the forget and retain set. This suggests that the simple MIA that we're considering should be reasonably effective."
I believe this should be changed to: "As per the above plot, the distributions of losses are quite different between the train and test set. This suggests that the simple MIA that we're considering should be reasonably effective."
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unlearning-challenge/starting-kit/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3R53JTKUHR7BRF4LMVV6LXNNO2NANCNFSM6AAAAAAZWHIYLE . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
The comment after the plot of histogram of losses on train vs test set of the pre-trained model (first plot) says: "As per the above plot, the distributions of losses are quite different between the forget and retain set. This suggests that the simple MIA that we're considering should be reasonably effective."
I believe this should be changed to: "As per the above plot, the distributions of losses are quite different between the train and test set. This suggests that the simple MIA that we're considering should be reasonably effective."