Testing Matera data on a different branch

unmonastery / untransit

Public Transport in Matera and beyond

Other

3 stars 1 forks source link

Testing Matera data on a different branch #10

Closed mstn closed 10 years ago

mstn commented 10 years ago

[ ] create a different branch for testing Matera gtfs
[ ] Import fresh gtfs data for Matera.
[ ] Change UI in order to make clear where data are missing/incomplete
[ ] add Matera gtfs to gitignore

elf-pavlik commented 10 years ago

@mstn @fvitullo let's please stop commiting gtfs data to this repo! maybe we can use submodules instead? or just grunt task to fetch it while keeping it in .gitignore

cdbkr commented 10 years ago

@elf-pavlik Sorry about that. I was trying that and thought it could be useful to push the changes, but you are right. Are you ok with adding the submodule to public/data/matera and using https://www.npmjs.org/package/grunt-update-submodules ?

elf-pavlik commented 10 years ago

@fvitullo sounds good to me! if you make pull request for that i'll merge it :smile:

mstn commented 10 years ago

Sorry I didn't write a clear description for this task (just edited). I was going to work on a different branch in order to see what Matera gtfs looks like now and improving ui a bit. I agree with @fvitullo grunt+submodule is good (I'll create a different issue). We could integrate scripts we did for exporting data from OSM as a kind of library.

mstn commented 10 years ago

@elf-pavlik @fvitullo I propose as a general rule one should assign a task to him/herself if (s)he is going to work on it. In this way we should be able to avoid to overlap. Moreover, please add a issue for whatever you want to do in this way the others can keep track of what is happening.

cdbkr commented 10 years ago

Added CONTRIBUTING.md to latest Pull Request so we can define general rules for contributing.

elf-pavlik commented 10 years ago

@mstn can we close this one since i merged #13 ?