wlcobb
commented
4 years ago @babonaresh I added notes from the meeting and their feedback.
The colors for the mission need to match what was defined in maps.
Circle for Community Partner
Black triangle for campus partner
red triangle for colleges and units.
Don't include big circle for UNO/CPI
Filters need to work
Legends should be consistent across the different charts.
Pop up needs to be updated
Feedback notes: This cannot be the default view. Let’s simplify. I can help.
Start of the middle should be UNO. Second Circle should be Colleges and Main Units, Third Circle should be Campus Partners, Fourth Circle should be community partners.
Community partners should be color coded by mission area to match the colors in maps. We need to use different shapes for UNO v. community partners.
Size of the circle should denote the number of projects.
You could differentiate the types of partners with different shapes as well, but only if you feel comfortable doing this. This is not required.
Make all interactions one color (we do not need to differentiate colors by engagement type and we will rely on the filter for this).
We need a MUCH more expanded view of this. We need to actually be able to see/read this analysis. Don't keep it in a box.
I am unable to set the filters. So i can not even investigate this.
We would like to see a network analysis chart/map that shows the interaction, Lines should reflect the different projects connecting campus to community. Community partners should be connected if there is a triangle relationship.
We should consider color coding based on engagement type of mission area (or both).
We should also have the option of viewing this information by Mission area, subcategories, organization types, college/main unit, campus partner, subcategory areas, year, CEC building partner.
This is a high priority