Closed ghost closed 8 years ago
You've merged this but not marked it closed @bruceeddy. Is this resolved?
Yes.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:29 AM, CliveEvans notifications@github.com wrote:
You've merged this but not marked it closed @bruceeddy https://github.com/bruceeddy. Is this resolved?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/unruly/java-8-matchers/issues/1#issuecomment-175538184 .
Bruce Eddy Development Team Lead | Phone: +447837795402 http://go.unruly.co/emailhome http://time.com/4177155/super-bowl-ads-most-shared/ Find our offices http://go.unruly.co/emailoffices | Read our latest research http://go.unruly.co/emailresearch [image: Facebook] http://go.unruly.co/sigFB [image: Twitter] http://go.unruly.co/sigTwit [image: LinkedIn] http://go.unruly.co/sigLI [image: YouTube] http://go.unruly.co/sigYT
The contents of this email are confidential and the information in it may not be disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you have reason to believe that you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please contact the sender immediately.
Unruly Group Limited - Registered in England No. 5411297, VAT #: 108 2572 28 Registered Office: 42-46 Princelet Street, London, E1 5LP, UK
Currently, we cannot match an
Optional<List<String>>
against Hamcrest'shasItems
matcher, which matches againstOptional<Iterable<? super String>
.We can support matching against a generic type that extends that of the matcher.