I like the syntactic sugar of pipeWith, as it follows more logically in my head (and also nicely emulates the way RxJs does things). That said, I feel like the distinction between the first parameter and the rest could be made clearer by changing the format to
pipeWith(dataIn)(
fn1,
fn2,
fn3
) // etc
Alternatively, you could add it with a different name like pipeFrom to avoid it being a breaking change.
I like the syntactic sugar of
pipeWith, as it follows more logically in my head (and also nicely emulates the way RxJs does things). That said, I feel like the distinction between the first parameter and the rest could be made clearer by changing the format toAlternatively, you could add it with a different name like
pipeFromto avoid it being a breaking change.