Closed akalinux closed 5 years ago
The test should be named anyevent_websocket_client__unix.t
or similar since it is a test of the connection class.
I think that is the last of the changes. Anything else?
I would like to say thank you for being so responsive, not many authors are.;)On Jan 14, 2019 5:33 AM, Graham✈️✈️ notifications@github.com wrote:@plicease commented on this pull request.
In lib/AnyEvent/WebSocket/Client.pm:
});
+# fixed bad bad pod encoding + +=encoding utf8
pod testing happens after dzil builds the dist:
xt/author/pod.t .................. ok
xt/author/pod_coverage.t ......... ok
xt/author/pod_spelling_common.t .. ok
xt/author/pod_spelling_system.t .. ok
It's sort of pointless to test the incomplete POD.
—You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Following up?
The more I think about it, the more I would like to implement this like so:
https://github.com/plicease/AnyEvent-WebSocket-Client/pull/45
Reasons:
AnyEvent::Socket
. The API has its drawbacks, but it is sufficient and doesn't require learning something new for those who already know it.AnyEvent::Socket
. The tests for my proposal are as a result much simpler since we only need to make sure that the arguments passed into connect
are used with tcp_connect
.Well I currently have both implemented. So?
Meh,
Trimmed everything down: --- removed constructor option -- removed unix=>socket option
As per our email chain.
I have done the following.
I also found pod errors/warnings and cleaned those up as well.