Open ErfolgreichCharismatisch opened 3 years ago
So compatibility and expandability. Yet, what is the average joe's incentive to use it?
On one hand, the GIT-like experience: Having multiple versions of the same object. We think this is very useful on some environments like mutliple parties working on the same document, or letting people propose changes to content without having write permission.
And then, compatibility and expandability will enable a wide set of interoperable applications, making old siloed applications feel dumb.
The first idea that came to mind was the official narrative regarding Covid and alternative narratives.
Let's assume a structure of
Government
Assumption 1
Conclusion 1
Assumption 2
Conclusion 2
Assumption 3
Conclusion 3
Would the average joe now fork the government approach and change Conclusion 1 or Assumption 3 to his perspective?
Yes, then make a pull request. We could even replace the Government with a DAO to accept the PR. Have you seen the DAO-governed content in the demos?
What is a DAO, what a PR?
Pull request. DAOs are "democracies on the blockchain".
What I see in your work is a big focus on avoiding censorship(blockchain approach), which seems to be the biggest difference to other approaches.
I wonder: was that developed based on a requirement or your fascination for it?
We work with different blockchain communities, they wanted to have DAO-governed content and gave us some funds.
Hop on to our discord and we can continue talking there :) https://discord.gg/B9RNY9s
That's a great question @ErfolgreichCharismatisch . I'm just learning about the Underscore Protocol myself, but I think _Prtcl could make Wikipedia even better by composing articles using standard structured objects (evees) for its paragraphs and sections.
But as @pepoospina said, Wikipedia is a single application, so it is just one possible use for _Prtcl.
See title.