Open breslie opened 5 months ago
I think I didn't include the n-1 rank results in the qpwave output because a rank of n-1 corresponds to 0 degrees of freedom and a chi-squared value of 0. And so chisqdiff
should always just be chisq
from the n-2 rank column, and p_nested
/taildiff
would be p
/tail
from the n-2 rank column.
Do you have an example of qpWave output where the n-1 rank row contains information that is not also in the n-2 rank row? If yes, what's the command that you're using?
qpwave()
is just a wrapper around the qpadm()
function with target = NULL
. qpadm()
has an argument return_f4
, so you could run qpadm('data/prefix', left, right, target = NULL, return_f4 = TRUE)
to get the f4 dataframe.
Hi, I'm having some issues running qpWave (with a genotype file as an input rather than f2_blocks):
In the original Admixtools the number of ranks outputted is the number of left populations -1, however when using admixtools2 (and in the qpWave example in the admixtools2 docs) the highest rank in $rankdrop is the number of left populations -2. Is there a reason for excluding the n-1 rank from results? Additionally when I run qpWave this way it also does not output anything for the f4 dataframe.
Thanks! All the best, E