I noticed that our typology.py code for At Risk of Gentrification only indicates that these tracts should have a 0 for gent_90_00 and gent_00_18. However, this omits the gent_90_00_urban and gent_00_18_urban columns, which address gentrification in urban tracts. As a result, I noticed that our SF typology output includes 5 tracts that did undergo urban gentrification, but were marked as ARG.
Is that working the way it's supposed to, or should we change that in the code?
I noticed that our typology.py code for At Risk of Gentrification only indicates that these tracts should have a 0 for gent_90_00 and gent_00_18. However, this omits the gent_90_00_urban and gent_00_18_urban columns, which address gentrification in urban tracts. As a result, I noticed that our SF typology output includes 5 tracts that did undergo urban gentrification, but were marked as ARG.
Is that working the way it's supposed to, or should we change that in the code?