When I increment the number of sats I get fairly ugly numbers in the BTC field. I.e., 14 sats is 1.4e-7 btc.
This is generally pretty simple:
We should ensure to whatever degree possible, we only render BTC balances that are numeric in nature, no mathematical notation. Trailing zeros should only really be counted to the fourth zero, i.e. 0.0004.
Galen Feedback:
This is generally pretty simple:
We should ensure to whatever degree possible, we only render BTC balances that are numeric in nature, no mathematical notation. Trailing zeros should only really be counted to the fourth zero, i.e.
0.0004.