group feed: timestamps should use relative time

[matildepark]

As per @jyng and stamped by @urcades — we need to amend Timestamp to render relative timestamps as a boolean or something, so group feed renders in relative time.

Note the use of monospace — I believe as per @urcades we are "all in on Inter" these days but unsure.

@tacryt-socryp apparently does not know how; perhaps @liam-fitzgerald can pair with quickly.

[jyng]

I think we still use monospace for node names. I'm ambivalent about this, but I just want it to be consistent.

[urcades]

For nodes names yes, this is a pattern we are still rolling with.

Per the issue, we definitely want to start using Inter for dates/times — so far Galen's been liking the latest updates to Chat, which use Inter as timestamp typeface. I think this is the way to go, and does make monospace that much more special when we deploy it.

— ~fabled-faster https://urbit.org/

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 6:41 PM Jimmy @.***> wrote:

I think we still use monospace for node names. I'm ambivalent about this, but I just want it to be consistent. [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9557907/112907898-70b65a80-90a3-11eb-8415-de9af415d93e.png

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/urbit/landscape/issues/671#issuecomment-809759547, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJD2Y4T32B2ZWMQDSUBLLTTGD6YNANCNFSM42ASJXEQ .

[jyng]

Per the issue, we definitely want to start using Inter for dates/times

The mocks above are outdated. My updated design uses Inter for dates/times.

[tacryt-socryp]

Closed by https://github.com/urbit/urbit/pull/4698