Open shaelatoo opened 1 year ago
That's right; the easiest solution right now is to rescale the coordinates of the constraints by a factor of 2.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:16 PM Shaela Jones @.***> wrote:
I think QRaFT is binning the 1024x1024 COR1 images to 512x512, but the header array has NAXIS, CRPIX, etc values that don't reflect these changes.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/uritsky/QRaFT/issues/1, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHFLCFIHQ4WC73MX2QO5ZRDWOPB2VANCNFSM6AAAAAATGILFI4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Dr. Vadim Uritsky, Assoc. Prof. Physics Department Catholic University of America Rm 206, Hannan Hall 620 Michigan Ave. N.E. Washington, DC 20064 1 (202) 319 5538; 1 (301) 286 0546 @.; @.
I think QRaFT is binning the 1024x1024 COR1 images to 512x512, but the header array has NAXIS, CRPIX, etc values that don't reflect these changes.