Any plan to support trio?

[seidnerj]

If you could point me in the right direction I might be able to implement this myself and add a PR.

Thanks in advance

[uriyyo]

Hi @seidnerj,

Sorry for long response, I will try to figure out, if it's possible to have integration with trio.

[uriyyo]

Hi @seidnerj,

New version 1.24 has initial trio integration. It will be great if you can try it out)

[seidnerj]

Hey Yurii, By the way, how does your plugin interplay with the (now builtin) support:

https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/PY-57667/Asyncio-support-for-the-debugger-EXPERIMENTAL-FEATURE

[uriyyo]

It's actually works as expected. Because plugin replaces default debugger implementation with custom one. The custom implementation is not affected by this new built-in feature.

Actually, I checked out what their implementation looks like and I guess they took idea of initial implementation from my plugin (at least it looks very similar). The idea was to use nest-asyncio package to allow to run coroutines inside running event loop.

But this plugin solved a lot of issues and did not use nest-asyncio package anymore.

Things that are solved by this plugin and not solved by built-in implementation (that I have found in latest PyCharm EAP):

• multiline statement code execution.
• reflect assigment inside expression.
• if contextvar is changed inside coroutine, the change is reflected in the current context (works in this plugin, but not in builtin).
• trio support (I mean, I did it only this week, but a least it's some kind of support).
• no patching of asyncio package (I faced several issues with nest-asyncio package).

[seidnerj]

Great, I am using it right now. So far, so good! 🙏

[uriyyo]

Great, I am closing this issue. Please, open a new one if you will gonna find some bugs.

[seidnerj]

Will do! 🙏