Examples table

[maelle]

Fix #62

[maelle]

Given the examples don't all use the latest version of the action, I was wondering whether this makes sense (as opposed to making the table for a test repo whose workflows would be kept up-to-date). :thinking: At the same time it's nice to see others have adopted it as a complement to GitHub search.

[SuperKogito]

You make a great point but sadly I don't have a clear answer to this. My idea/ vision for the test-repo is to have a packed workflow exploring/testing almost all variant/inputs of the action. The workflow will be triggered by any new release of the action, that way we will be the first to test the action. I am still not sure about how all this will look like once implemented and whether it will cause a conflict against your suggestion, that's why I cannot tell for sure. @vsoch will surely provide a nice input on this.

[vsoch]

I didn't even see this! The table is missing some spacers, I checked it's rendering and it's off a bit :)

[vsoch]

Oops nevermind, bad copy paste! Here is how it looks

[maelle]

Done! :heavy_check_mark:

[SuperKogito]

I prefer the long name, not everyone know about the abbreviations plus that's the name on the organization page, so i don't see why do we favor the abbreviations? same for r-hub.

[vsoch]

Here is the final table! The spacing is just right now, aesthetically pleasing.

The one future tweak we can do is to give that table it's own proper section - in my PR #64 I was calling it "In the Wild" or something like that.

[maelle]

And there could also be a sentence linking to a GitHub search of YAML files mentioning the action. 🤔

[maelle]

Was @superkogito answer above missed?

[maelle]

(R-hub is not an abbreviation though)

[vsoch]

I'm a part of us-rse, so I think I can solidly say that it's referred to very commonly as us-rse, especially around documentation for the organization and on GitHub. So that along with how much nicer the table renders is a good call I think. I wrote that original link also, and while it might be appropriate for a single list of names, it makes the table look weird to have it so long!

@maelle that would be a good idea too!

[vsoch]

I also don't think people looking for examples care so much about a specific org (they'd rather see an example) and if they do, they can click the link and read the full (extremely long!) name, lol.

[SuperKogito]

I still disagree xD but two votes beat one, so we can to other things ;)