Thanks for working on this! I would label the keys slightly differently to make sure that LB0-LB5 and RB0-RB5 still correspond to the same position as on other boards. E.g., LB2 should correspond to the middle-finger on the left-bottom row. Otherwise, combos won't be invariant to switching boards by just swapping out the definition file. For example, something like this:
NB: I am not sure what's the best label for the two extra inner keys on the bottom row. I suggested LF0, LF1, RF0, RF1 as they are already used on one other board (standing for "floor" row). But I am open to other naming schemes as long as all keys on the "core positions" are consistently named.
Thanks again!
If that makes sense, if you could update the PR, it would be great to get it in.
Thanks for working on this! I would label the keys slightly differently to make sure that LB0-LB5 and RB0-RB5 still correspond to the same position as on other boards. E.g., LB2 should correspond to the middle-finger on the left-bottom row. Otherwise, combos won't be invariant to switching boards by just swapping out the definition file. For example, something like this:
NB: I am not sure what's the best label for the two extra inner keys on the bottom row. I suggested
LF0
,LF1
,RF0
,RF1
as they are already used on one other board (standing for "floor" row). But I am open to other naming schemes as long as all keys on the "core positions" are consistently named.Thanks again!
If that makes sense, if you could update the PR, it would be great to get it in.