Open milstan opened 2 years ago
Hello @milstan, we're unlikely to drop enums as explained here. However I think for some will may be adding a other
value and add a non-required string field for people to be able to precise it.
@KBKat does it make sense to have a other
value for this case ?
Hi again ! The structure of the SecurityMeasures was one of the issues we had with the DPV (which I explain here. The DPV classification of Security measures can however be used as description.
We will think about making the type required or not in our review of the required field. Thank you for the feedback.
In UROPA, for most of the properties you allow free text to be entered. However you do define 3 allowed values for securityMeasureType.
This is suboptimal. If someone wants to use UROPA together with DPV which defines terms for Security Measures they can't but they are obliged to chose one of your values (or map DPV values to them).
I suggest you simply drop the enum, and leave it to the implementing system to chose the vocabulary they want to use.