Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
With your configuration (async false) the session *should* be stored in
memcached before the response is returned.
Can you reproduce this issue with debug logging enabled (see
https://code.google.com/p/memcached-session-manager/wiki/SetupAndConfiguration#C
onfigure_logging) and share logs from the involved tomcats?
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 23 Jan 2015 at 10:07
Disclosure: I know the original poster and am a bit closer to the issue
I have created a project on github that is able to demonstrate the issue.
https://github.com/tyrinslys/spring-webflow-memcache
Running the example if all things were in working order I would expect to get a
heap space error.
Instead I get an error from the flow controller that the specific snapshot can
not be found.
Caused by:
org.springframework.webflow.execution.repository.snapshot.SnapshotNotFoundExcept
ion: No flow execution snapshot could be found with id '2583'; perhaps the
snapshot has been removed?
It seems to happen at random.
As a summary here is what this bug demo webapp is doing:
1. creating a map and placing it in session (sessionMap)
2. grab sessionMap and add one Integer pair to it (not a replace but mutating
the map in session)
3. starting the flow
4. setting a counter in flow scope
5. issuing a redirect using the redirect directive (this actually sends a 302)
6. browser then requests the new url
7. same as step 2
8. add 1 to the counter in scope (then log it)
9. return a vew that has a meta redirect
10. browser calls server again
11. loop back to step 2 only we are not starting another flow... but continuing
the existing flow.
I'll update if I find a certain version mix to fix the issue.
Original comment by tyrins...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2015 at 10:00
So... ignore me for a while. It appears I had settings incorrect and the
example project doesn't illustrate the issue. I'll get back
Original comment by tyrins...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2015 at 2:01
Ok.
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 5 Feb 2015 at 2:41
First I want to make sure my assumption is correct, please confirm the
following.
If sessionBackupAsync="false" is in the config then the system behavior should
be the same as using the default tomcat session manager (when looking from the
point of view of the browser).
If that is not the case then please provide more information.
So an issue I was able to bring out with my example project is that when I run
more than one flow at a time the conversation is lost.
Summary:
The problem is that no more than 1 flow is able to run at a time, without error.
Caused by:
org.springframework.webflow.execution.repository.snapshot.SnapshotNotFoundExcept
ion: No flow execution snapshot could be found with id '58'; perhaps the
snapshot has been removed?
Running Tomcat without memcache allows the max configured webflows to run
without issue. Once past that we get a NoSuchConversationException which is
expected as the first created webflow is deleted from session.
Caused by:
org.springframework.webflow.conversation.NoSuchConversationException: No
conversation could be found with id '1' -- perhaps this conversation has ended?
To recreate this run the following link in multiple tabs with the example
project.
http://localhost:8080/spring-mvc-showcase/flow/testFlow?debug=grow
Oh and here is version information:
apache-tomcat-7.0.57
memcached-session-manager-1.8.2.jar
memcached-session-manager-tc7-1.8.2.jar
spymemcached-2.11.1.jar
Original comment by tyrins...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2015 at 8:02
I have even tried lockingMode="all" which I think would make sure simultaneous
threads are not causing issues, but the issue is still found.
Original comment by tyrins...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2015 at 4:19
Re sessionBackupAsync="false": yes, the system behavior should be the same as
using the default tomcat session manager (when looking from the point of view
of the browser).
I checked out your project and ran
http://localhost:8080/spring-mvc-showcase/flow/testFlow?debug=grow, which is
then counting and counting (I stopped at "Count now is 712").
What can I do to reproduce your issue?
Btw, great that you've setup the sample project!
Cheers,
Martin
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 10 Feb 2015 at 9:46
Looks like you got the project setup. To test you run that url in 2 tabs so the
same session is being edited by both tabs.
I took the liberty of adding the lockingMode="all" to the context file in the
project as I thought that would solve the issue.
I believe the problem shows itself when 2 requests for memcache-session happen
at the same (similar) time.
Again with memcache configured in tomcat with the provided context the example
does not work... and removing it, which uses tomcat session management, the
issue magically is gone.
Please remember the context file is not automatically deployed but must be
copied to the tomcat home config dir and a tomcat restart issued.
Let me know if you still have issues, and I will be happy to assist.
Original comment by tyrins...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2015 at 10:30
Ok, this way I can reproduce the issue. One important thing is that you're
using non-sticky sessions, which means that a session is only stored in the
tomcat internal session map for the duration of a request. I'd say that using
lockingMode="all" should solve concurrency issues, I need to think about it
what might be the issue. Perhaps there's also an issue with web flow
serialization, I'd need to understand the internals of webflow and how things
are serialized/restored. Finally I'd say it doesn't seem to be easy to be
solved but needs some deeper investigation.
Do you need non-sticky sessions, or could you just use sticky sessions?
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 11 Feb 2015 at 9:03
Issues are moved to github, this one is now
https://github.com/magro/memcached-session-manager/issues/263
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 24 Aug 2015 at 3:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mcon...@ccnag.com
on 23 Jan 2015 at 3:40