Closed gineika closed 3 months ago
Hiya 👋 Thanks for the prompt report!
As far as I can tell, this seems to be a small regression in graphql.web@1.0.5
with field arguments after an aliased field name not respecting ignored tokens.
This should be fixed with the hotfix I just published with @0no-co/graphql.web@1.0.6
Describe the bug
Urql version
urql v4.0.7
Works with urql v4.0.6 AND @0no-co/graphql.web v1.0.4
Validations