Open webmaven opened 11 years ago
+1. Would be great to have them sorted according a given criteria.
Ok good. We don't have any sorting at the moment but we will add this for the next version of document. Thanks for this good recommendation.
Also we could filter it, not only sort it :)
And also categorize them?
So I think we should have an advanced grid for doing filtering, sorting and categorizing.
+1 Please filter them alphabetically by default.
+1 As the list grows, it would be really handy to be able to filter and sort them by the various features.
+1, absolutely agree with opener)
Still no indication of what the list order means, or any way of sorting the list.
However, the list is filterable (by the text in the descriptions), which is a nice improvement.
So, I guess I'll leave the issue open. :smiling_imp:
Hey yeah sorry, been a bit swamped lately.
I think most diffing libs rely on similar methods to reduce the amount of work they need to do on every cycle. I hope this explains how to do it for morphdom / choo too. Thanks! 🍕
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017, 03:00 Michael R. Bernstein notifications@github.com wrote:
Still no indication of what the list order means, or any way of sorting the list.
However, the list is filterable (by the text in the descriptions), which is a nice improvement.
So, I guess I'll leave the issue open. 😈
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/usablica/front-end-frameworks/issues/10#issuecomment-282181698, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACWleocdobf5k6qdII5C4bPBrWipb67jks5rfjnOgaJpZM4AdCwe .
It is unclear what the sort order of the frameworks is. Is it some measure of popularity? Making this explicit would be helpful.