Closed stevevance closed 9 years ago
@stevevance, are the results any better if you use "geometry" instead of "geometry_within" - since your borders are so close to the Census boundaries it might play nicer. The algorithms for within/intersects are part of the ArcGIS server. It might be worth adding extra intersect modes directly selectable by users in the future. I went ahead and made an issue for that. (#142)
@afrasier The screenshots show the difference in using the geometry & geometry_within parameters. Within is too explicit (restrictive) and excludes too many tracts or block groups to make it useful. Thanks for making the new issue!
These two screenshots shows the result of when I send my containing geometry and ask for the container mode of "geometry" (intersects) and "within". The containing geometry is a Chicago community area called Avondale. The boundaries of Chicago community ares do not change and for the most part line up with Census tracts.
Is it possible to set a tolerance mode that will return the Census tracts that are "mostly" within the containing geometry? (This image shows how the borders are essentially the same but drawn with errors.)