Closed martinfleis closed 1 week ago
@anastassiavybornova Do you have any opinions on where this data should be stored? Do you think the current pathing Martin implemented here is sufficient?
how about having subfolders for each method's output? so {fuaID}/{method}/output.gpkg
, where one of the {method} subfolders will be manual
(and others: parenx, osmnx, ...)
how about having subfolders for each method's output? so
{fuaID}/{method}/output.gpkg
, where one of the {method} subfolders will bemanual
(and others: parenx, osmnx, ...)
Good idea. It fits the current schema. I'll pull down and make changes locally.
@martinfleis @anastassiavybornova
For some FUA's there is already a manual/
directory with a .parquet
inside. For example, data/1133/manual/
...
For some FUA's there is already a manual/ directory with a .parquet inside
we should probably follow that
For some FUA's there is already a manual/ directory with a .parquet inside
we should probably follow that
I will:
.parquet
versions are the same data as the .gpkg
ones.gpkg
to .parquet
where there is no .parquet
Any thing else to think about here?
That's probably it
check to ensure the
.parquet
versions are the same data as the.gpkg
ones
If I find any differences I'll report back here.
archeology details: that was me who uploaded the .parquet ones, at some earlier iteration (for the feature matching). i got them from the gdrive and extracted only the "final version" layer before saving to parquet. but these might be superseded then by what martin uploaded?
archeology details: that was me who uploaded the .parquet ones, at some earlier iteration (for the feature matching). i got them from the gdrive and extracted only the "final version" layer before saving to parquet. but these might be superseded then by what martin uploaded?
So how about I just take those ones in this PR > change directory > convert to .parquet
Those uploaded here are most likely exactly the same as those @anastassiavybornova uploaded before.
@anastassiavybornova @martinfleis Let's get yalls eyes on this for approval before merging.
ref #70
@jGaboardi this may not be optimal format or placement. Feel free to move them around if you prefer different setup, I am just dumping here what I got.