[data] ensure correct `output` from #71

[jGaboardi]

[data] ensure correct output from #71

• xref https://github.com/uscuni/simplification/issues/70#issuecomment-2186461796

[jGaboardi]

So here's the layers that are available for our FUA's:

Aleppo
  - ['roads_output', 'polygons_output']
Auckland
  - ['roads_input', 'polygons_output', 'roads_output']
Bucaramanga
  - ['roads_input', 'main']
Douala
  - ['roads_input', 'roads_output']
Liège
  - ['roads_output', 'roads_input']
Salt Lake City
  - ['roads_output', 'polygons', 'roads_input']
Wuhan
  xx gpkg_in.exists()=False

We have a roads_output for all FUA accept Bucaramanga and also Wuhan (because it doesn't exist yet)

@Kryndlea @dancejod Can either of you confirm that main in Bucaramanga is simply a renamed version of roads_output?

[dancejod]

So here's the layers that are available for our FUA's:

Aleppo
  - ['roads_output', 'polygons_output']
Auckland
  - ['roads_input', 'polygons_output', 'roads_output']
Bucaramanga
  - ['roads_input', 'main']
Douala
  - ['roads_input', 'roads_output']
Liège
  - ['roads_output', 'roads_input']
Salt Lake City
  - ['roads_output', 'polygons', 'roads_input']
Wuhan
  xx gpkg_in.exists()=False

We have a roads_output for all FUA accept Bucaramanga and also Wuhan (because it doesn't exist yet)

@Kryndlea @dancejod Can either of you confirm that main in Bucaramanga is simply a renamed version of roads_output?

@jGaboardi that's right, it is supposed to be roads_output, double checked just in case👍

[jGaboardi]

OK, cool.