Closed runvnc closed 10 years ago
After reading about this $240 million Oregon "Obamacare" debacle, I have to add one more related issue. Resource allocation. With some projects coming in with extremely poor outcomes despite having what looks like plenty of resources, it is apparent that funds are not being properly allocated. That ties in again with the politics at the outset that I mentioned, and then the "Iron Triangle" or PMBOK Star come in.
Thanks for this feedback. Take a look at the proposed addition in v1.0 and see if this helps address the point. Also please feel free to suggest a "Key Question" that might draw this out.
The main reason that projects do not work well or do not meet delivery dates or budget expectations is that the goals are simply unrealistic given the actual resources available.
This is going in the right direction as far as providing some flexibility in project contraints, but only mentions one aspect -- scope -- and to a limited degree. See the "Iron Triangle" or PMBOK Star etc. Working within that structure of constraints and flexibility in all project management areas including resource allocation, scope, schedule, etc. are necessary for success.
These types of issues are directly affected by political situations, and so projects cannot be successful without successfully managing exterior politics that intersect at the project outset and throughout the process in a way that continues to align with the selected project configuration given the constraints.