Replace drink sandbox by internal ink_sandbox

[pgherveou]

Remove the drink dependency, and move the drink::Sandbox to it's own package.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.96491% with 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.20%. Comparing base (72a671c) to head (8d8aaa6). Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
crates/e2e/sandbox/src/macros.rs	83.67%	8 Missing :warning:
crates/e2e/sandbox/src/api/contracts_api.rs	88.57%	4 Missing :warning:
crates/e2e/src/sandbox_client.rs	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:
crates/e2e/macro/src/config.rs	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:
crates/e2e/src/error.rs	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2158 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 53.64% 54.20% +0.56% ========================================== Files 225 231 +6 Lines 7095 7204 +109 Branches 3129 3153 +24 ========================================== + Hits 3806 3905 +99 - Misses 3289 3299 +10 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

🦑 📈 ink! Example Contracts ‒ Changes Report 📉 🦑

These are the results when building the integration-tests/* contracts from this branch with cargo-contract and comparing them to ink! master:

Contract	Upstream Size (kB)	PR Size (kB)	Diff (kB)	Diff (%)	Change
call-builder-return-value	9.249	9.249	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
call-runtime	2.071	2.071	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
combined-extension	2.132	2.149	0.017	0.797373	:chart_with_upwards_trend:
conditional-compilation	1.502	1.502	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
contract-storage	7.58	7.58	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
contract-terminate	1.369	1.369	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
contract-transfer	1.731	1.731	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
cross-contract-calls	7.732	7.732	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
cross-contract-calls/other-contract	1.595	1.595	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
custom-allocator	7.787	7.787	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
custom-environment	2.158	2.158	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
dns	7.355	7.355	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
e2e-call-runtime	1.32	1.32	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
e2e-runtime-only-backend	1.901	1.901	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
erc1155	14.345	14.345	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
erc20	6.955	6.955	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
erc721	10.044	10.044	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
events	5.27	5.27	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
flipper	1.651	1.651	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
incrementer	1.516	1.516	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lang-err-integration-tests/call-builder-delegate	2.65	2.65	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lang-err-integration-tests/call-builder	5.571	5.571	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lang-err-integration-tests/constructors-return-value	1.997	1.997	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lang-err-integration-tests/contract-ref	5.062	5.062	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lang-err-integration-tests/integration-flipper	1.827	1.827	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
lazyvec-integration-test	4.66	4.66	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
mapping-integration-tests	8.036	8.036	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
mother	12.753	12.753	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
multi-contract-caller	6.654	6.654	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
multi-contract-caller/accumulator	1.388	1.388	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
multi-contract-caller/adder	1.922	1.922	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
multi-contract-caller/subber	1.942	1.942	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
multisig	21.871	21.871	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
payment-channel	5.742	5.742	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
psp22-extension	7.083	7.083	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
rand-extension	2.977	2.977	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
sr25519-verification	1.154	1.154	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
static-buffer	2.578	2.578	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
trait-dyn-cross-contract-calls	2.899	2.899	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
trait-dyn-cross-contract-calls/contracts/incrementer	1.557	1.557	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
trait-erc20	7.331	7.331	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
trait-flipper	1.502	1.502	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
trait-incrementer	1.626	1.626	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/delegator	3.96	3.96	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/delegator/delegatee	1.641	1.641	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/delegator/delegatee2	1.641	1.641	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash-migration	1.755	1.755	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash-migration/migration	1.462	1.462	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash-migration/updated-incrementer	1.909	1.909	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash	1.755	1.755	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash/updated-incrementer	1.733	1.733	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:
wildcard-selector	2.858	2.858	0	0	:heavy_minus_sign:

Link to the run | Last update: Tue Mar 19 16:52:03 CET 2024

[deuszx]

Won't this become a maintenance problem? Previously, when we wanted to extend capabilities of drink! we had to do it only for that one crate - drink! itself - now, there are two sandboxes - drink's and ink's. How do you envision the future of the tool if one of its biggest users is now ink! itself? drink is used not only as ink's native e2e test backend but standalone as well.

[pgherveou]

Won't this become a maintenance problem? Previously, when we wanted to extend capabilities of drink! we had to do it only for that one crate - drink! itself - now, there are two sandboxes - drink's and ink's. How do you envision the future of the tool if one of its biggest users is now ink! itself? drink is used not only as ink's native e2e test backend but standalone as well.

@deuszx to be clear, the goal is to move the shared part to ink!, not to duplicate the trait. The follow up will be to remove the code in drink! repo and use ink_sandbox as a dependency instead.

I agree that this is moving the maintenance burden, from one repo to the other, but because drink! already has (indirect) dependency on the ink! repo, it would make the overall maintenance much easier if we re-organize the dependency as suggested here.

What do you think?

[pgherveou]

drink! side of the migration https://github.com/inkdevhub/drink/pull/119

[pgherveou]

I have both side of the drink! sandbox migration ready to review. This is kind of annoying to rebase and maintain as a branch so ideally we can merge that quickly. cc @cmichi @ascjones @deuszx

[deuszx]

From my perspective looks good but let's consider separating release cycles of Sandbox and ink! as you mentioned in the comment.

[pgherveou]

LGTM

Thank you @pmikolajczyk41 @deuszx ❤️

I have excluded ink_sandbox from the release and added a note to the release, not sure if there is a better way to do it

See relevant commit here https://github.com/paritytech/ink/pull/2158/commits/11757409c9b05fdb1ab7988355585eb4d03d38ef