Open sashokbg opened 10 months ago
Do you mean docker image with Bruno CLI ? I would like it too as I am planning to run Bruno collections as part of our Gitlab pipelines, so I would not need to prepare my own custom image :)
I meant both cli and client but then I understood that the client is a standalone app and not a web page 🫣
+1 for a container image containing the Bruno CLI.
We need this image for running tests as part of our test automation and would like to avoid having to track new releases and maintaining our own image.
In the mean time: https://github.com/davidkarlsen/bruno-image - but it would be good to have in this repo.
.. client but then I understood that the client is a standalone app and not a web page 🫣
It's not bad thinking out of the box, contrary it is recommended.
It would be nice to have the client served on a webserver and we could proxy/port to our developer portals importing collections from GitLab repositories on the fly, having it linked under our knowledgebase sections, so less technical people could reach out API docs, descriptions and details. This helps for DRY and increases interoperability cross departments in org.
+1 for a container image containing the Bruno Client.
A customer mentioned Bruno to me this morning, and I believe it's a superior solution compared to other hybrid/SaaS options like Postman. I'm looking forward to the availability of Bruno as a Docker image in the near future. 🤞🏽
I want to visit bruno through the web page, I wonder if I can do it?
I spotted this Bruno container image that seems autonomously maintained, continuously: https://hub.docker.com/r/alpine/bruno -- based on Alpine Linux.
Note: it's managed by a "Bill Wang; Community Organization" whose user/organization name is alpine
; not to be confused with the makers of "Alpine Linux".
Hello, I think a docker container available at docker hub will be a nice addition to this project. Is this something planned in the near future ?
Do you need a contribution ?