Open seanhamlin opened 6 months ago
Agreed on the backup id. I wouldn't hide it though, but perhaps truncate it, or something similarly to how we can expand and contract the deploy key
Instead of having it display like a secret though, it could just be truncated so it would appear like b80693be...
and then clicking the eye would expand it so it could be copied out
HTH,
At present, I see a couple of UX issues with the backup table.
Backup ID
- this data is only ever useful for commands that involve restic really, the average user does not care about the backup ID. I think this could perhaps be hidden by default, and available somehow to retrieve for advanced users (e.g. title text, or a copy button or something). This forces the table to squish, e.g. thesource
column needs more space.Backup size
- this at present is formatted as680.06MB
, I think it could be just without the 2 decimal places, that level of accuracy is not needed.