Closed wcarter closed 7 years ago
You have referred to the use of a Title Type 9. It is valid. See Table 6. Title Type Possible Values in the User Guide for the complete list.
You are correct that use of Title Type 9 is rare. The other time it has been used in 113th-present data is for [113th] H.R.370
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/114/hr/BILLSTATUS-114hr5148.xml
has the following official title item:
This is the only bill status file for the 114th congress with this title type. Is it a data error?