Open anuraggulati opened 4 years ago
Thanks for reporting this. We'll take a look at it. It appears that the space between the section number and the section title is intentional, though it is acting in a responsive manner, so the wider your window is, the wider the gap. That may not be ideal. The equivalent PDF has a gap as well, but the pdf is in a two column layout, which would force a smaller space.
See via the UI: Details xml pdf
Note that the xml for the UI is broken down to the section level compared to the volume level breakdown in the bulkdata repository.
Need to do a little investigation on the sans-serif to serif issue, since the xsl doesn't reference serif fonts at all. all of the font-family declarations simply state "sans-serif", though one for .GID has Sans-serif
. I don't think that would affect anything, but may be an issue.
Adding to our backlog to address.
I also discovered a slight discrepancy between the cfr.xsl used in our bulkdata repository and the UI (/content/pkg) version . Will look at that as well.
Thanks Jon. I do hope these findings are helpful.
I am happy to help test these should you need.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 10:04 pm, Jon Quandt notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. We'll take a look at it. It appears that the space between the section number and the section title is intentional, though it is acting in a responsive manner, so the wider your window is, the wider the gap. That may not be ideal. The equivalent PDF has a gap as well, but the pdf is in a two column layout, which would force a smaller space.
See via the UI:
Details https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2020-title17-vol2/CFR-2020-title17-vol2-sec43-1
xml https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title17-vol2/xml/CFR-2020-title17-vol2-sec43-1.xml
pdf https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2020-title17-vol2/pdf/CFR-2020-title17-vol2-sec43-1.pdf
Note that the xml for the UI is broken down to the section level compared to the volume level breakdown in the bulkdata repository.
Need to do a little investigation on the sans-serif to serif issue, since the xsl doesn't reference serif fonts at all. all of the font-family declarations simply state "sans-serif", though one for .GID has Sans-serif. I don't think that would affect anything, but may be an issue.
Adding to our backlog to address.
I also discovered a slight discrepancy between the cfr.xsl used in our bulkdata repository and the UI (/content/pkg) version . Will look at that as well.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/usgpo/bulk-data/issues/63#issuecomment-682840536, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBUZ5VDO7VT26XCGMMTAO3SC7L75ANCNFSM4QEMBQXA .
See screenshots.