usgs-makerspace / makerspace-sandbox

Some initial R code for playing with data processing (maybe some light visualization).
Other
0 stars 5 forks source link

Viz release technical check-list #556

Open abriggs-usgs opened 4 years ago

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

Since the Gages Through the Ages Visualization is next on the agenda for public release, I thought it would work to start assembling the 'viz release technical check-list' here.

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

I'm gonna start a list of ideas that are on my mind at the moment; we can sort and filter later. So here it goes. stuff for analytics

mwernimont commented 4 years ago

I thought we had a GA ID already?

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

True, we are making a list for future applications while the information is fresh in our minds. So everything in the list should be pretty much done for Gages. This is in preparation for the Viz Release Checklist meeting on Thursday. So feel free to make note of anything that you have done recently that could apply to future applications.

lindsayplatt commented 4 years ago

Social media:

mwernimont commented 4 years ago

Social Media Video Guidleines: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-video-specs-guide/ Social Media Image Guidleines: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-image-sizes-guide/

lindsayplatt commented 4 years ago
lindsayplatt commented 4 years ago

Post-release:

lindsayplatt commented 4 years ago

Completed draft list

Performance testing (when - early and often)

during project setup

each iteration:

Compliance

during project setup

Web analytics

during project setup

when 'steps to public release' start add final tracking

Social media / outreach (probable duration 2-4 weeks)

when 'steps to public release' start, so should the social media plan

Steps to public release (probable duration 2-4 weeks)

when given confirmation from the project champion that the product, in its current form, is ready

Post-release

jordansread commented 4 years ago

Nice work.

Final content review (do we need peer review via IPDS?)

yes, we need to do this.

lindsayplatt commented 4 years ago

Just to clarify - we need an IPDS for every viz? Or does it depend?

jordansread commented 4 years ago

For every "web site" release, so any hosted viz. Not every social media file though.

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

@wdwatkins would you mind taking a peek at the 'completed draft' a couple sections up and see if there is anything of which you can think to add?

wdwatkins commented 4 years ago

I added a bullet about testing to the analytics section. Looks good though!

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

@jread-usgs and @amrhoades I went through the above draft and added some 'when to start this part' guidelines, but I was struggling with the words to describe the starting point for the 'steps to public release.' Right now, I have used the words "when project criteria are complete and the application is 'finished'". But in retrospect, I feel that for most projects this would be a vague rather than clear line. Perhaps, there needs to be some process so that the Project Champion can officially sign off that the goals of the project have been met (the scope is fulfilled/user stories satisfied/feature development is closed/etc.) and the release process has begun.

amrhoades commented 4 years ago

@abriggs-usgs - the gate should be: confirmation from the project champion that the product, in it's current form, is ready.

amrhoades commented 4 years ago

@abriggs-usgs - I'm going to remove the Gages label since this list is for all projects, not just gages.

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

I created https://github.com/usgs-makerspace/makerspace-sandbox/issues/566 and placed it in the 'ideas' column with the label 'Makerspace processes.' The thought is that issue 566 can be used a template to create a new issue at the start of each project that will capture the entirety of the Public Release Process.

jordansread commented 4 years ago

re: "One more ✔ (but from who?)" on the draft list - I think that is turning out to be Adrienne (Chief of Staff) or her proxy, but that may change in the future and we will need to adapt if it does.

abriggs-usgs commented 4 years ago

Okay, thanks. I was meaning to get clarification on topic on Friday since you said 'and yes, I didn't forget that I need to say yes/no regarding prod'. I wasn't sure under which of your three hats you where operating when giving that 'okay' and I wanted to capture the correct titles and procedures in the 'check list'. Would it be something along the lines of this:

-- in the above, unsure on the Group Sponsor (verses Project Champion verse Division Director) and unsure at what level Adrienne's Chief of Staff title is applied.

jordansread commented 4 years ago

Yeah, good clarification there. I was in communication w/ Adrienne's proxy (because Adrienne was on leave) and trying to wrap up several last requests that came out of that interaction. So in that case I was handling the "One more ✔️" and we weren't quite able to get there in that case (on Friday) so I had us stand down.