Closed lindsayplatt closed 4 years ago
Left == scaled by diameter (on test now), right = scaled by area (local only)
Spring, irrigation.
Winter, thermoelectric.
Summer, public supply
Should also consider applying Flannery's compensation https://makingmaps.net/2007/08/28/perceptual-scaling-of-map-symbols/. Equation outside of Arc can be found at https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/97902/flannery-compensation-in-leaflet-js
Wondering if we should decrease max stroke-width from 60 to 40 along with this?
It does allow the smaller circles to be seen more as less overlap between the large circles leaves transparency. So I am digging that about the 40.
yeah, i like the transparency with 40!! i think seeing the individual circles feels more meaningful representing this data rather than blobs.
okie dokie, 40 it is!
These look good. I think Public supply is still a little hard to see because the points are so regular across the country. Is it possible that they look a little blurry? How do the legend categories that you are working on relate to the number of categories of circles shown on the map? are the smallest dots less than or equal to 160?
This is a better way to scale dots and I didn't think I could do it before because of how we were drawing them as paths with round line-endings, but my discovery today about stroke-width == circle diameter made me realize it is possible.