Currently only record group numbers are implemented, but we need collection identifiers as well. This is problematic because some collection identifiers include terms that can be found in other collection identifiers or RG#s, so you can get more than one result with some queries. e.g., searching "302" on RG#s and collection IDs at the same time will get you both RG 302 and collection JFK-302.
Currently only record group numbers are implemented, but we need collection identifiers as well. This is problematic because some collection identifiers include terms that can be found in other collection identifiers or RG#s, so you can get more than one result with some queries. e.g., searching "302" on RG#s and collection IDs at the same time will get you both RG 302 and collection JFK-302.