Closed smuellerDD closed 2 years ago
You can use any valid access token for the header. I am seeing this same error now, we are diagnosing the problem.
Confirmed, working.
But what is the next step? I would have expected that I get a kind of request ID like for ACVP where I can ask NIST to give me a certificate?
Next step is on the NIST side. Data gets bundled and sent to Resolve for a manual review. Labs are updated on progress using encrypted email via the normal module review process.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021, 4:30 AM smuellerDD @.***> wrote:
Confirmed, working.
But what is the next step? I would have expected that I get a kind of request ID like for ACVP where I can ask NIST to give me a certificate?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/usnistgov/ESV-Server/issues/11#issuecomment-916730401, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATQXELDHK3KJRFCDR7C3TDUBG63TANCNFSM44YEW7QA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 05:41 -0700 schrieb Chris Celi:
Next step is on the NIST side. Data gets bundled and sent to Resolve for a manual review. Labs are updated on progress using encrypted email via the normal module review process.
Ok, but isn't there a kind of ID that allows us to refer to the open request? What happens if a lab has 10 parallel requests outstanding. How can we identify a particular outstanding validation?
Thanks Stephan
Soon we will add in a TID (or similar) for a lab to track the entry.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021, 9:06 AM smuellerDD @.***> wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 05:41 -0700 schrieb Chris Celi:
Next step is on the NIST side. Data gets bundled and sent to Resolve for a manual review. Labs are updated on progress using encrypted email via the normal module review process.
Ok, but isn't there a kind of ID that allows us to refer to the open request? What happens if a lab has 10 parallel requests outstanding. How can we identify a particular outstanding validation?
Thanks Stephan
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/usnistgov/ESV-Server/issues/11#issuecomment-916889963, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATQXELITTDIQCZJ7T2BDQLUBH7GLANCNFSM44YEW7QA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
Fixed in the latest release to Demo. Added an "EID" field for tracking a submission through the review process. Will update documentation.
I sent the following data to the /certify endpoint:
The server returned:
Note: may I ask for a clarification on the relationship of the access token that should be used for the authorization bearer? At the moment, I use the ea-access token as authorization bearer.