Pad track: evasion

[mlourencoeb]

Dear @mlngan

I am writing to ask if there is mandatory to implement evasion for the new pad challenge. If case it is optional, should we return not implemented error status to not be considered for that track?

Best, /m

[mlngan]

Per the API and evaluation plan, it is not required to implement both PAD functions. For the function that you choose not to implement, please return ReturnCode::NotImplemented.

[mlourencoeb]

Thanks for the quick reply. In that case, I believe that the algorithm is not even considered for the other evaluation type, right? Best, /m

[mlngan]

That is correct.