CS is “IF RXA-9.1 = 00 Then RXA-5.1 SHALL BE a code in the value set CVX_active”.
Note, CVX_active is the same as CVX but I changed some of the code 01-05 to E from R.
RXA-9.1 = 00 in the message (it is hidden here because there is very little room in the UI to view the message :<) ).
For Image 1, why isn’t RXA-5.3 not flagged as not being CVX? The binding is CVX not NDC.
Now is image 2, I changed RXA-5.1 to 01 which is a valid code in CVX but marked as ‘E’ in CVX_active. The conformance statement should still trigger but did not. Why wasn’t this error (invalid code system, found NDC expected CVX) caught in image 1? I can’t view whether 01 is actually marked as E, which is what I suspect the issue is. It is marked in IGAMT, image 3.
Image 4, I have 01 with the CVX code system. I should get the error for the CS but do not. So the E is not accounted for. Didn’t we have this issue in the past.
Binding of RXA-5.1 is CVX.
CS is “IF RXA-9.1 = 00 Then RXA-5.1 SHALL BE a code in the value set CVX_active”.
Note, CVX_active is the same as CVX but I changed some of the code 01-05 to E from R.
RXA-9.1 = 00 in the message (it is hidden here because there is very little room in the UI to view the message :<) ).
For Image 1, why isn’t RXA-5.3 not flagged as not being CVX? The binding is CVX not NDC. Now is image 2, I changed RXA-5.1 to 01 which is a valid code in CVX but marked as ‘E’ in CVX_active. The conformance statement should still trigger but did not. Why wasn’t this error (invalid code system, found NDC expected CVX) caught in image 1? I can’t view whether 01 is actually marked as E, which is what I suspect the issue is. It is marked in IGAMT, image 3.
Image 4, I have 01 with the CVX code system. I should get the error for the CS but do not. So the E is not accounted for. Didn’t we have this issue in the past.