Open DM1122 opened 9 months ago
🤖
Hi @DM1122,
Good to see you back! I hope you're doing well.
Sure, you can add a specific color for the "WILL" requirement qualifier by modifying the go.Binding
for the "fill" property of the go.Shape
that represents the chip. Here's how you can do it:
$(
go.Shape, // chip
"RoundedRectangle",
{
row: 1,
column: 0,
width: 70,
height: 18,
parameter1: 100,
strokeWidth: 0,
},
new go.Binding("fill", "qualifier", (qualifier) => {
if (qualifier === "SHALL") {
return "#06c769" // green
} else if (qualifier === "SHOULD") {
return "#2196f3" // blue
} else if (qualifier === "WILL") {
return "#f3a621" // orange, or any color you prefer
} else {
return "#cccccc" // default grey
}
})
),
In this code, we added a new condition in the function that binds the "fill" property of the chip. If the qualifier is "WILL", it will return an orange color. You can replace "#f3a621" with any color you prefer.
This solution ensures that the color scheme is not hardcoded because it uses a function to determine the color based on the "qualifier" property of the data. If you want to change the color scheme in the future, you just need to modify this function.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find the current color scheme used for other requirement qualifiers or the "WILL" requirement qualifier in the tree-visualizer codebase. If you have more information about this, it would be helpful to provide it.
The WILL requirement qualifier currently shows up with the default colour. All qualifiers should have a colour, and the colour scheme should not be hardcoded