Closed jack-oquin closed 10 years ago
To address the other two issues I would remove Requester
and Scheduler
from the top-level namespace, but that might require modification of existing import references.
@stonier:
I don't mind leaving Requester and Scheduler in the top-level namespace.
If we do leave them there, they need to be clearly documented. Sphinx currently documents them as rocon_scheduler_requests.requester.Requester
, etc. I am not sure how to fix that, although it's not wrong and does work. Maybe it's enough to mention the shorter name in the doc string for the class.
We need a top-level documentation page specifically for the rocon_scheduler_requests namespace, explaining what is there and an overview of how people should use it.
Re-opening this issue until that is done.
rocon_scheduler_requests
.