utexas-bwi / segbot_simulator

Gazebo simulation for the BWI Project segbot
http://wiki.ros.org/segbot_simulator
Other
3 stars 2 forks source link

need help on setting various parameters for navigation stack #15

Open dikke opened 11 years ago

dikke commented 11 years ago

Hello

I am following your navigation stack parameters used in the segbot_simulator. In the simulation, it works very well.

However, when I used this set of parameters in the real segway rmp 50, it is very jerky. I have looked around and see that you are using eband as your local planner. However, I am using base_local_planner supplied by the ROS. I am wondering if you have the set of parameters that's suitable for base_local_planner?

piyushk commented 11 years ago

We switched over to eband pretty early, so we never tested much with base_local_planner. I don't remember base_local_planner being jerky, just not very good. I'm afraid I can't help you much there.

dikke commented 11 years ago

Ok. Thank you for your reply. I just saw the older version of the "segbot_navigation" that contains what I want. I am wondering if you are also using eband for the simulator as well?

Thank you

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Piyush Khandelwal"notifications@github.com; 发送时间: 2013年8月22日(星期四) 凌晨1:40 收件人: "utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator"segbot_simulator@noreply.github.com; 抄送: "dikka"dikka@qq.com; 主题: Re: [segbot_simulator] need help on setting various parameters fornavigation stack (#15)

We switched over to eband pretty early, so we never tested much with base_local_planner. I don't remember base_local_planner being jerky, just not very good. I'm afraid I can't help you much there.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

piyushk commented 11 years ago

Yes. We use eband in simulation as well.

The older version of segbot_navigation contains launch/configuration files for base_local_planner - but it was never tested well.

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:56 PM, dikke notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok. Thank you for your reply. I just saw the older version of the "segbot_navigation" that contains what I want. I am wondering if you are also using eband for the simulator as well?

Thank you

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Piyush Khandelwal"notifications@github.com; 发送时间: 2013年8月22日(星期四) 凌晨1:40 收件人: "utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator"segbot_simulator@noreply.github.com; 抄送: "dikka"dikka@qq.com; 主题: Re: [segbot_simulator] need help on setting various parameters fornavigation stack (#15)

We switched over to eband pretty early, so we never tested much with base_local_planner. I don't remember base_local_planner being jerky, just not very good. I'm afraid I can't help you much there.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator/issues/15#issuecomment-23036660 .

dikke commented 11 years ago

Ok. Thank you. I will get back to you shortly. For the time being, you can close this issue.

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Piyush Khandelwal"notifications@github.com; 发送时间: 2013年8月22日(星期四) 凌晨2:04 收件人: "utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator"segbot_simulator@noreply.github.com; 抄送: "dikka"dikka@qq.com; 主题: Re: [segbot_simulator] need help on setting various parameters fornavigation stack (#15)

Yes. We use eband in simulation as well.

The older version of segbot_navigation contains launch/configuration files for base_local_planner - but it was never tested well.

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:56 PM, dikke notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok. Thank you for your reply. I just saw the older version of the "segbot_navigation" that contains what I want. I am wondering if you are also using eband for the simulator as well?

Thank you

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Piyush Khandelwal"notifications@github.com; 发送时间: 2013年8月22日(星期四) 凌晨1:40 收件人: "utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator"segbot_simulator@noreply.github.com; 抄送: "dikka"dikka@qq.com; 主题: Re: [segbot_simulator] need help on setting various parameters fornavigation stack (#15)

We switched over to eband pretty early, so we never tested much with base_local_planner. I don't remember base_local_planner being jerky, just not very good. I'm afraid I can't help you much there.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/utexas-bwi/segbot_simulator/issues/15#issuecomment-23036660 .

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

dikke commented 11 years ago

hi.

would you mind to help me a bit getting the eband to work? I have a "eband_local_planner" package and your "eband_local_planner-devel" inside my groovy workspace. I have rosmake the former package, but then when I roslaunch it with gmapping, it gives me the following error:

[FATAL] [1377189154.528823141, 258.856000000]: Failed to create the eband_local_planner/EBandPlannerROS planner, are you sure it is properly registered and that the containing library is built? Exception: Could not find library corresponding to plugin eband_local_planner/EBandPlannerROS. Make sure the plugin description XML file has the correct name of the library and that the library actually exists. [move_base-3] process has died [pid 10582, exit code 1, cmd /opt/ros/groovy/stacks/navigation/move_base/bin/move_base __name:=move_base

This is probably due to the fact that "eband_local_planner-devel" hasn't been built. I try rosmake your package, but I had little success. Any help on this issue will be much appreciated.

Thank you

jack-oquin commented 11 years ago

If you mean utexas-bwi/eband_local_planner, the answer is simple: that package has been converted to catkin. You need to build it in a catkin workspace, not via rosmake.